EASTERN UP REGIONAL PLANNING PAST PROJECTS
BROWNFIELD INFORMATION
On Monday, October 30th 2017, the Eastern Upper Peninsula Regional Planning and Development Commission hosted a Brownfield Lunch and Learn at the Little Bear arena in St. Ignace. For a PDF of the full presentation, click here!
Here are links to some helpful materials regarding Brownfield redevelopment:
Our Expert Panel included:
Ryan Londrigan DEQ Brownfield Coordinator | Jen Tucker MEDC Community Assistance Team | Bret Stuntz AKT Peerless | Mark Van Doren Smith & Company | Michael Larson Michigan Energy Options |
989.891.6072 | 906.201.4367 | 248.302.1398 | 906.440.6738 | 906.226.1136 |
LondriganR@michigan.gov | TuckerJ6@michigan.org | StuntzB@aktpeerless.com | mvandoren@gmail.com | mlarson@michiganenergyoptions.org |
Are there other development or community topics that you think we should host Lunch and Learns about? Let us know!
EUP REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
EUP REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY
As a result of the recently completed New Economy 101, 201 and 301 sessions conducted in the Eastern U.P., a group of stakeholders that attended these sessions are beginning the process of developing a Regional Growth Strategy for the Eastern U.P. Region.
AN ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY STUDY FOR THE MICHIGAN UPPER PENINSULA/WISCONSIN BORDER REGION
2013 2nd Annual Twin Sault’s Bi-National Conference
Ian McMillan – Sault Ontario Tourism
Linda Hoath – Sault Michigan Tourism
David McLachlan – Tourism Northern Ontario
Pasi Lautala – Freight (Rail) Transportation
Caroline DeGroot – Northern Ontario Transportation Studies
Dr. Steven Kesler – Mining in the Great Lakes
Jim Radabaugh – Governor Snyder’s Showcase Trail
Carol Oitment – The Value of Trails
LITTLE RAPIDS HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT
Rapids habitat on the St. Marys River has historically been impacted by various forms of development, including dredging, filling, diversion, and urban development. Construction of the causeway across the Little Rapids degraded the rapids and damaged the health of the native fish community. However, with proper engineering and design, the site can be restored to provide foraging, spawning, and nursery habitat for a wide variety of sport fish as well as other aquatic organisms needed for a healthy river system. Planning for this project was locally initiated over two decades ago with input from local stakeholders guiding restoration efforts.
The big rapids that we associate with the locks and International Bridge were not the only rapids in the river. The “Little Rapids” were located between Sugar Island and what is now Rotary Park in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. These smaller rapids were mostly destroyed when dredging for navigation and construction of the island causeway leading from the Ferry dock greatly reduced the flow in that area. From 1928 until about 1960 there were three cuts, each about thirty feet wide, in the Sugar Island ferry causeway. These openings, which allowed water to flow from the north side to the south side of the causeway, had bridges across them for traffic. The openings were plugged around 1960, replaced by the two culverts, which only allowed for a much-reduced flow.
Based on recommendations following a feasibility study funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Program, the outdated culverts are being replaced with a 600 foot bridge. The increase in water flow will improve 50-70 acres of aquatic habitat.
Project Goals Included:
- Water flow will be restored and this will cause an increased quantity and quality of fish spawning habitat, and habitat for other native plants and animals
- The culverts needed to be replaced, and the new bridge will be safer and more usable than a causeway. A pedestrian walkway included in the bridge design will provide community opportunities for fishing, bird watching, and recreation
- Recreational anglers already spend an estimated $2.5 billion annually in Michigan, with at least $7 million generated annually by fishing on the St. Marys River. The additional fishing opportunities created by this project will generate additional tourism revenue
- This is the final project necessary to address habitat-related Beneficial Use Impairments at the St. Marys River and the last anticipated project for the US side of the Area of Concern This is a crucial step toward its eventual removal from the list of Great Lakes AOCs or “toxic hotspots”
STUDIES & ASSESSMENTS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL INFO
Addendum #3 – contains instructions to the bidders on what pages need to be swapped out of their original RFP documents. | Addendum #3 (Redline) – contains a redline version of the changed pages to help the teams better understand the changes that were made. | Addendum #2 – Contains instructions to the bidders on what pages need to be swapped out of their original RFP documents. | Addendum #2 (Redline) – Contains a redline version of the changed pages to help the teams better understand the changes that were made. |
Addendum #1 – Contains instructions to the bidders on what pages need to be swapped out of their original RFP documents. | Addendum #1 (Redline) – Ccontains a redline version of the changed pages to help the teams better understand the changes that were made. | Information to Proposers (4/17/15) | Reference Index Documents (4/17/15) |
Book #1 (4/17/15) | Book #2 (4/17/15) | Book #3 (4/17/15) | Please note that RFPs were reviewed and Payne and Dolan were selected. |
FUNDED PARTNERS
Since the early 1990s, the Little Rapids Restoration Project has brought together local, regional, state, and federal partners. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative has provided funding for our partners’ efforts.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration provides the funding for the project and coordinates much of the project review. | The Great Lakes Commission received a Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) grant from NOAA for implementing the project. | Chippewa County Road Commission owns the road being replaced. They are implementing the work, in charge of construction, and will continue to own the bridge once it is completed. | Lake Superior State University is monitoring the impact of restoration on the aquatic ecosystem. | Eastern Upper Peninsula Regional Planning and Development Commission received a Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) grant from NOAA to fund hydraulic modeling, engineering design, and an environmental assessment (completed August 2013) and now facilitates local communications. |
STAKEHOLDERS
The St. Marys River Bi-National Public Advisory Council was formed in 1988 to identify projects which would address Beneficial Use Impairments in the St. Marys River, including the Little Rapids Restoration. | Michigan Department of Environmental Quality partners in the delisting of all Michigan AOCs and issues permits for the project. | United States Environmental Protection Agency provides funding to NOAA and is working to restore the 27 remaining U.S. AOCs in the Great Lakes Basin. | The Soo Area Sportsmen’s Club initiated the planning for the Little Rapids Restoration Project in 1992. | The Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority supports the Great Lakes Resource Committee, which serves as inter-tribal management body for the 1836 Treaty fishery. | The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division regulates angling and fish populations in the St. Marys River. |
PAST CEDS & REGIONAL PROSPERITY INITIATIVE: ELEVATING THE EASTERN UP
Elevating the Eastern Upper Peninsula is the 2015-2019 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy and the 2015-19 Regional Prosperity Initiative plan for the Michigan counties of Chippewa, Luce and Mackinac. This plan is not only a declaration of where those affecting economic development across various fields intend to see the region be by 2019, but it is a living document putting forth the first steps we will take towards a prosperous future.
“Michigan’s Eastern Upper Peninsula will be a region in the world attractive to enterprise, students, tourists, and residents alike: where one can be immersed in a natural setting yet access 21st-century amenities; and where opportunity prevails through the application of modern techniques, collaboration, and mindful allocation of resources.”
Development of Elevating the Eastern Upper Peninsula began in late-July of 2014 with a meeting of the Stakeholder Committee where regional assets and needs were identified and focus areas for this plan were established. Six focus areas were deemed priorities for developing this plan: education, economic and workforce development, health care, tourism and natural resources, agriculture and local food systems, and infrastructure. Since then, the Stakeholder Committee met twice more, the Regional Economic Development Advisory Committee—a smaller committee, which has been in place for the development of previous economic development plans—met five times (twice in conjunction with the Stakeholder Committee), and six focus-group meetings were held—one for each focus area.
Ultimately 65 partners worked to implement 24 strategies. Between 2015 and 2019, 92% of the 83 action items saw significant progress or were completely achieved.
This progress was documented annually in the performance reports under “CEDS & RPI DOCUMENTS” below.
EASTERN UP TARGET MARKET ANALYSES
Can families find their ideal home in our region?
In 2015, EUPRPDC, Central Upper Peninsula Planning and Development, and the Western Upper Peninsula Planning and Development Region commissioned Land Use | USA to prepare a housing target market analysis (TMA) for every county in the Upper Peninsula. This project aims to provide housing developers with essential market knowledge to encourage private-sector investment in the types of housing in demand by those who choose to live in these parts of Michigan.
In addition to the studies, the most prevalent “LifeMode Groups” have been identified for each study area. These groups represent potential markets as defined by lifestyle and demographic characteristics. Detailed descriptions are outlined for each of the top potential markets for each community underneath that community’s retail study. Examining these descriptions can provide further guidance on retail development.
How can these studies be helpful?
These studies can inform a review of local policies for permitting, zoning etc. to ensure that they allow for growth that would meet the demand which is currently being met elsewhere.
Existing businesses can use this study to help determine if they are fully meeting their potential. Could a change in variety of offerings or how the business presents itself increase sales?
And this study can be used to support new investment, through guiding local entrepreneurs or attracting a second or third location of a successful business in a different community.
Products for the 2016 Housing Target Market Analyses:
- Housing Target Market Analysis Workbook
- Housing Target Market Analysis Missing Middle Housing Guide
- 2016 Chippewa County Housing Target Market Analysis
- 2016 Luce County Housing Target Market Analysis
- 2016 Mackinac County Housing Target Market Analysis
In 2017, EUPRPDC commissioned the Gibbs Planning Group to prepare a retail target market analysis (TMA) for seven local communities. Empty commercial properties can be found throughout our region, and they are particularly unattractive in our downtown centers that cater to visitors. These studies are one step towards filling these vacancies. By identifying existing demand and proposing a potential for expansion in square feet, these studies offer concrete ideas for potential growth.
What is a Target Market Analysis?
It is the study of the types of people who are likely to live in an area and the types of housing they will likely demand; it projects which types of housing and how large of a supply will be needed based on anticipated growth patterns. For a more detailed explanation and the methodology that was used for this study, please consult pages 1 and 14-through-29, respectively, in the Housing TMA Workbook, which can be found below.
Stakeholders identified “Increasing the stock of attractive, affordable housing in the region” as a major infrastructure strategy last year; this project represents the public-sector culmination of the goal. See Elevating the Eastern Upper Peninsula, the region’s economic development plan for more information.
Completed 2017 Retail Target Market Analyses:
- Brimley Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
- Clark Township Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
- Mackinac Island Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
- Newberry Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
- Paradise Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
- Soo Township Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
- St Ignace Retail Market Study
- Most prevalent “LifeMode Groups”:
TRANSPORTATION-LOGISTICS STRATEGY
This page currently contains the request for proposals for the Eastern Upper Peninsula Transportation-Logistics Strategy. As the strategy is developed, EUPRPDC will publish relevant documents, drafts, and plans so that anyone can view and consume the information.
This project was funded by EUPRPDC, the Chippewa County Economic Development Corporation, the U.S. Economic Development Administration, and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation.
Final Task 1 Report – TLS Feasibility
Final Task 2 Report – Strategic Actions